Ask Gary: What's wrong with 2017 regs?
GARY ANDERSON answers your questions on ground effect, whether Ralf Schumacher deserved his Formula 1 chance, ideas for 2017 rule changes and the advantages of inexperienced drivers
I can see why you think the proposed rule changes for 2017 won't have the desired effect, but I thought a chunk of the 5-6s improvement was supposed to come from the reintroduction of ground effect. You would also get greater traction in corners, meaning faster exits onto straights, and as ground effect is a more efficient way of obtaining downforce, it would result in a lower drag coefficient of the car, meaning the top speed of the cars on straights will be faster still. This, combined with stickier tyres and a wider track, would surely result in a formula that rewards balls and does not inhibit close racing? Or am I misled?
James Tregellis, via email
James, you are right - the majority of this laptime would have to come from the extra downforce and extra top speed. What I was saying was that it needs a lot to achieve that five- or six-second improvement.
Share Or Save This Story
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.