Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe
Autosport Plus

F1 doesn't need magic formats, just equality

In a week when qualifying formats and teams' varied FOM income have dominated the headlines, DIETER RENCKEN argues a fairer revenue split would instantly solve most on-track problems - and proposes how

Two stories hogged Formula 1's headlines last week: A (temporary) resolution to the farcical qualifying debacle, and Autosport's disclosure of the projected payments to teams - based on F1's 2015 receipts and paid out by commercial rights holder Formula One Management in nine tranches during '16 followed by a 'balance' (or check) payment in February '17.

This 10-way division is crucial, as it explains the difference between projected payments, actual payments and reported payments during a given financial year because amounts could vary due to bad debts, unexpected income (for example, assume an India or Korea settles any arrears to FOM from previous years) and/or other provisions.

Previous article Ask Gary: Why wouldn't customer cars work?
Next article Analysis: Are F1 teams serious about a grand prix format revamp?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe